Well, it looks like Scott Peterson has been sentenced to death, but Robert Blake hasbeen found not guilty. How could this be? After all, there doesn't seem to have beenany witnesses or any concrete (no pun intended) evidence for either of them.
If anything, Blake's purported discussions regarding "hitmen"seems to be more damning than anything Peterson did, although Petersoncertainly had coincidental and suspicious behavior. Or maybe it was the O.J.mentality in which a "star" (used in the loosest sense, although Iwas a big Baretta fan) cannot be convicted.
I think the only logical explanation is that Scott Peterson seemed like a cad and ascoundrel and Laci and Connor were the obvious,innocent victims.
Conversely, while Robert Blake also came off as somewhat of a scoundrel (although abumbling buffoon of a scoundrel), Bonnie Lee was the epitome of an individualundeserving of sympathy. Not that her unsavory behavior warranted her murder,but what can you do?
The bottom line is, would it not have been easier for both of these"gentlemen" (or should I say, Scott, since he is the one convicted)to have sought out the services of their favorite attorney competent in divorceand family law, than to go this twisted and demented route? It makes you wonderwhat is in the minds of some people, doesn't it.
No comments:
Post a Comment